-
Posts
491 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
-
Location
Glasgow, UK
Recent Profile Visitors
1,799 profile views
-
SrPx reacted to a post in a topic: What is the difference between Lanczos seperable and non-seperable.
-
Bartosz Borecki reacted to a post in a topic: What is the difference between Lanczos seperable and non-seperable.
-
SJPD reacted to a post in a topic: X-Rite Color Checker
-
Dee3676 reacted to a post in a topic: How to add a background
-
harrym reacted to a post in a topic: Why no Bitmap mode?
-
PaulEC reacted to a post in a topic: Change the default measurement of pixels in Units
-
harrym reacted to a post in a topic: Affinity Photo generally very unintuitive
-
harrym reacted to a post in a topic: Why can't I set inches a default
-
harrym reacted to a post in a topic: Window not scrolling when cropping
-
harrym reacted to a post in a topic: Preference for default zoom to not exceed 100% in Photo
-
harrym reacted to a post in a topic: Your Affinity 2020 wishlist
-
harrym reacted to a post in a topic: White, grey and black picker for color balance
-
A Surprising Proposal: HWB
harrym replied to dmstraker's topic in Feedback for Affinity Photo V1 on Desktop
This has turned into just the best interesting topic read! -
harrym reacted to a post in a topic: A Surprising Proposal: HWB
-
Mark Ingram reacted to a post in a topic: AP in Windows VM on Ubuntu? AFFINITY PLEASE COMMENT!
-
Set White Point, Photoshop-style
harrym replied to JDW's topic in Feedback for Affinity Photo V1 on Desktop
I disagree with the inference that serf devs don't care i think that's disrespectful. I also don't like users continually wanting AP to work like PS it has and should find its own way. Having said that it's clear that having a wander through these threads there are a relatively small number of long standing valid issues and feature requests, like the OPs, that do on the surface seem to be reasonably easy to implement, low hanging fruit if you will (I accept that is a dangerous assumption though!) Meanwhile how many hours were burnt on that astro module. I get the wish/need to widen the apps appeal to a wider audience, new sales. We all benefit from this even if we don't use a particular new feature but there is a danger that maintenance/improvement and addition of functionality to older features gets left behind. It's not just about driving new sales you need to keep existing users happy too. I'm 100% sure serf know their business better than me but as an outsider it does feel like the balance isn't quite right at times.- 35 replies
-
- photoshop
- white point
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Resolution for panoramas
harrym replied to DeepDesertPhoto's topic in Feedback for Affinity Photo V1 on Desktop
Are you on a windows box using graphics acceleration? I'm not convinced it's stable i had it shut down on me today, first time that's happened in literally years -
harrym reacted to a post in a topic: [Poll] Do you need a DAM? And what should it be like?
-
DeepDesertPhoto reacted to a post in a topic: Resolution for panoramas
-
Resolution for panoramas
harrym replied to DeepDesertPhoto's topic in Feedback for Affinity Photo V1 on Desktop
Yeah, at last! Here's hoping the pano dialogue gets some love and an upgrade at some point too! -
Hi @FedericoAimar So I'm having exactly the same issues as you, the image is what I would call a bit of a doozy! Having processed the CR2 file several different ways I have no doubts it's a 16-8 bit issue which basically everyone on the thread worked out already but I do wonder if that 50f/1.8 is contributing to the problem as you can see faint radial 'shadows' on the CR2 The best I could I could come up with is to export as PNG in RGB-8-bit Pixel format (Export Persona) which gives you a 13MG file so not quite as bad as 80. No help if your print service only accepts jpgs though! (I didn't bother with adjustments as that's not the issue) Regards H
- 19 replies
-
- banding artifacts
- export issue
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Cheers! I'll give it a go and get back to you
- 19 replies
-
- banding artifacts
- export issue
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi Frederico, welcome to the forum! Does this only happen with this image or all images? Looks like a fairly high dr situation. Would you be willing to upload the project file you have taken those screen shots of? The reason I'm asking is that I use canon too and export jpgs to print a lot, I've not had banding like that. Actually just for fun the original cr2 file would also be good so i could run it through my workflow and see what happens. Please excuse my Scottish! 😁
- 19 replies
-
- banding artifacts
- export issue
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Jenna Appleseed reacted to a post in a topic: Combining parts of images onto one
-
Alfred reacted to a post in a topic: Combining parts of images onto one
-
Xzenor reacted to a post in a topic: Combining parts of images onto one
-
Hi it123 I think it might be better if you stack your layers the other way round. Start with b&w as your base layer at the bottom of the stack then make your first layer visible and paint out what you don't want on it's mask. Then make your second layer visible and paint out what you don't want on its mask revealing what you want to see below. Keep doing that as you work up the stack. If you need a reference to the original layer as you edit it toggle the mask off and on. Remember the beauty of AP is just how much you can do non destructively. Anyway good luck with your light painting project!